LIGHTHOUSE LITERACY
Contact via email:
  • Home
  • The Lighthouse Library
    • Writing Resources >
      • Ideas
      • Organisation
      • Voice
      • Word Choice
      • Sentence Fluency
      • Conventions
      • Other Writing Routines
      • Writing Analysis
    • Reading Resources >
      • Reading Routines
      • Reading Skills and Strategies
    • Inquiry Song Book
    • Spelling Resources >
      • Spelling Strategies
  • The Beacon
  • Testimonials
  • Contact

Anchor Charts

23/7/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Things are essential, words only accidental; things are the body, words but the garment; things are the kernel, words the shell and husk. Both should be presented to the intellect at the same time, but particularly the things, since they are as much objects of understanding as is language.
What if I told you it was composed by Comenius in 1658? Astounding, right?

What Are Anchor Charts?
Anchor charts are also known as posters, charts, chart displays - you get the picture. The charts I'm talking about are those that are jointly created - by you and the students - and act as a second teacher in the classroom. They support the literacy strategies you teach by providing a visual reminder of what's been learned, and what's important.

What’s the Theory Behind Them?
You should Google Dual-Coding Theory. Dual-coding theory (Paivio, 1986) tells us that we can use our visual and auditory channels simultaneously to absorb more information than is normally considered possible, and avoid the dreaded cognitive load.

Humans receive information from the environment through visual and verbal info – they’re not the only ones, but they’re certainly key. Following a teacher’s verbal explanation is bit difficult. A teacher’s schema is in his/her head and we have to guess what that schema might be, and try to deduce it based on the oral language that’s being used. Words are linear, and the verbal channel is sequential, whereas visual information is synchronously organised and the eye can understand many elements at the same time. Both of these channels have limited storage capacity and are separate and independent.

But when images are linked to words, they enrich the encoding process. Together, they greatly improve the potential for retrieval. Visuals direct students’ attention and trigger prior knowledge or existing schema, which isn’t organised sequentially, but more like a diagram. Visual links found in diagrams stimulate connections between concepts that lead to more meaningful learning.

A picture paints a thousand words!  That’s how powerful visuals are!

Adding images to verbal explanation can make ideas concrete, which makes it easier to remember.  By adding graphics, we’re offering additional cues for retrieval (Clark, & Lyons, 2010, Caviglioli, 2019). 
Combining pictures, mental imagery, and verbal elaboration has proven effective in promoting understanding and learning from texts by students ranging from primary school to university studies.  

How Do I Create Them?  
You need a plan, some butchers paper, a few colourful textas, and a willingness to NOT re-create the chart at the end of the day to make it 'prettier', 'neater', or 'better'! That last one's a toughie for some of you, I know. But trust me - there are powerful connections being made by your students between what and how they see you writing, and what they're learning and remembering! (See Mayer’s research below!) 

If you’re creating your own anchor charts, please remember: 
  • Cut the amount of content to just key words.
  • Chunk the content. No long sentences. Think of section headings that stand out. This signals key ideas. Bold these headings, or put these ideas in capitals. 
  • Neatly lined up your writing. Bullet points help. Create order!
  • Restrain artistic urges. Use fonts and colours with restraint. (Caviglioli, 2019) 

Also, Mayer’s research (1991; 2001) has these suggestions:
  • Use words and pictures
  • Record pictures and corresponding words or explanations close together in space or time. That is, create your anchor chart while you present your mini-lesson, and not before!
  • Minimise irrelevant details
  • Reduce modality-specific interference by writing simply, rather than present on-screen animations. 

Why Else Are They So Darn Good?  
They Are a Reminder of Class Learning 
They're a semi-permanent reminder of class learning. Anchor charts can be on display for the week, the term, or the year. 
 
They Provide Exposure to New Vocabulary 
Anchor charts provide exposure to the vocabulary you'd like students to learn to describe their thinking. They also provide exposure to the correct spelling of words. This helps students to use visual (orthographic) and connecting (analogy) strategies for  spelling. 
 
They Reduce Cognitive Load and Provide Connections to Existing Schema 
They're a key classroom resource. Throwing anchor charts away immediately after creating them--or only ever recording jointly constructed texts on a screen--is disposing of a connection to prior learning. Shutting off the projector means that young Miles has to rely on his memory of the lesson when he wants to use the strategy you've taught! 
 
So you see that modelling for young readers the process of creating images to enhance reading comprehension and vocabulary learning will pay dividends!
0 Comments

Explicit and Direct Instruction: What's the Difference?

12/6/2019

0 Comments

 

Part 2

Picture
In Part 1, we explored explicit instruction. On, now, to direct instruction.

And then Direct Instruction.

Hang on to your hats. 

What is direct instruction?

Developed by Rosenshine in the 1970s, direct instruction is a systematic method for teaching a “...body of content or well-defined skills” in small steps (Rosenshine, 1986). He identified six teaching functions or components of direct instruction: review, presentation of new material, guided practice, feedback and corrections, independent practice and weekly and monthly reviews. It’s suggested that teachers review students’ previous learning, present material in small steps, ask questions, provide time for students to practice, check understanding and finally, provide a scaffold and opportunity for further application. Like P. David Pearson, Rosenshine appears to be a member of the radical middle, cautioning that “...in practice, these ideas require a good deal of art, creativity, and thoughtfulness to apply and modify these ideas for different students and different subject matter” (1986, p. 64). He also admits that the approach is less relevant to the teaching of writing, reading comprehension, analysing literature or history, or the discussion of social issues.

Highly prescriptive, but not scripted, one could imagine that these steps might introduce a scaffold for use by our early career teachers as they internalise the elements of a good explicit teaching session. However, direct instruction has now been commercially packaged as Explicit Direct Instruction, and it’s no longer the scaffold originally intended. The steps for Explicit Direct Instruction are - well - explicit, and the re-conceptualised intent is that they are followed precisely in order to maintain the integrity of the approach.

And this brings us to...

Direct Instruction

Notice the capitals?

That’s because this type of instruction relies on commercially available teaching resources and prescribed teaching tasks.  DISTAR, Sounds Write, MultiLit, DIBELS and SRA Reading Mastery are included here. Developed from the work of Engelmann and colleagues in the US and Canada in the 1960s, this type of instruction is highly scripted in terms of verbal and gestural language, and intolerant of flexibility or ‘riffing’ on the lesson. Hattie (2009, p. 205) uses the term,
guides, rather than scripts in his outline of the seven steps for Direct Instruction. Teachers are provided with rigorous training in order that they understand the lesson sequence and scripts. The aim of this is to ensure ‘quality control’ and to avoid instruction being influenced by personal teaching style or other variables that might affect the lesson delivery. One key goal is mastery of content. Based on behaviourist learning theory, when teachers follow the model, DI has been shown to work using assessment of exactly whatever it is that was taught. The use of DI is attractive for systems that are concerned about the quality and preparation of its teachers, and where there is a history of failure (Fullan et al., 2006, p. 9), or for schools with high teacher-attrition rates.

Like a poorly designed-rubric, this approach does not allow teachers to be exceptional. Nor does it take into account contexts of community. But, then again, maybe that’s not its purpose.

Hattie investigated four meta-analyses linked to the use of direct instruction/Direct Instruction, which he states has an effect size of .59 (if you can believe the effect sizes published, or really wish to apply them to your particular context after his initial debacle. See, for example: Bergeron, 2017; Lovell, 2018; Simpson, 2017; and the irrepressible ollieorange2). None of these research studies occurred in the last ten years. And none were conducted in Australian classrooms. Now, this is interesting: Despite the fact that Direct Instruction is currently listed as 49th out of the possible 252 influences, Hattie cautions that it is not any one script that makes a difference to learning; rather, it is a teacher’s ability to differentiate instruction, and to understand precisely how students’ learning is improving. Finally, he states that teachers should have access to adequate professional development that improves their strategic instruction (2009).

So, there you have it: the differences between explicit instruction, explicit direct instruction, and Direct Instruction. Let’s not create a false dichotomy, or engage in arguments that pit one approach against another without consideration of context and purpose. Let’s not be scared to engage in debate, but let’s keep our discussions clever and respectful. Let’s keep it nice.

There is room for all types of instruction during the school day, as any one of my experienced, qualified, hard-working teaching colleagues will tell you.

Yes, indeed. There are many ways to knit a jumper.

0 Comments

Explicit Instruction and Direct Instruction: What's the Difference?

9/6/2019

0 Comments

 

PART 1

Picture
​Before I begin, a disclaimer: This post won't be an argument for one type of instruction over another - direct, Direct, explicit or basic skills. Any type of instruction needs to be carefully considered in terms of the vast teaching repertoire and approaches required to educate the learners in our schools. We serve no purpose when we entertain arguments that focus on false dichotomies such as inquiry learning vs direct instruction, or problem-based learning vs teaching content, or phonics instruction vs ‘whole language’.

My intent here is simply to clarify the differences, so that qualified educators can engage in some professional discussion about the complexities and nuances of their work, without interference from the scarf-wearing, card-carrying supporters on the sidelines.

What is explicit instruction?

Explicit instruction is teacher-directed, carefully planned instruction that focuses on clearly-defined content, goals, skills and/or outcomes. It involves making clear the knowledge and skills that students require in order to approach other learning challenges - the what, the how, and the way in which the skill, strategy or content will be applied to authentic contexts. With regard to literacy, explicit instruction can be found in the teaching of basic skills of reading and writing, including phonics, understanding text structure, vocabulary, sentence fluency, and the multitude of reading strategies that enable students to comprehend and respond to texts. Differentiation occurs at the point of practice.

It is unscripted, but does involve explaining, demonstrating and modelling of content, skills and strategies that can be applied to the practice of other, more complex and authentic tasks.

Teacher agency is key here; teacher knowledge and expertise drives the decision-making. Systems, schools and principals that encourage the use of explicit instruction, clearly have faith in the quality, judgement and expertise of their teachers, and a belief that teachers will ask for the right professional development to meet their needs - and that systems, schools and principals will provide relevant professional learning opportunities.  

Stay tuned. Direct Instruction will be outlined in Part 2...
0 Comments

    Author

    Hi! I used to run Lighthouse Literacy. Now, I've moved on to another exciting adventure in school leadership.

    My days are filled with doing my most favourite activity in the world: teaching and learning with my colleagues and our students. 

    My teaching friends are very honest about the challenges they wrestle with. These are the issues I like to write about. 

    I live in Canberra with my husband, and my beagle. I have two amazingly creative and hilarious sons who seem to enjoy watching me do my 80s dance moves. 

    I'm also partial to eating Milo from the can.

    It takes all kinds. 


    ​E lighthouseliteracyconsulting@gmail.com

    Archives

    September 2020
    February 2020
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019

    Categories

    All
    Anchor Charts
    Change Fatigue
    Classroom Environment
    Classroom Instruction
    Direct Instruction
    Explicit Instruction
    False Dichotomies
    Flexible Seating
    Inference
    Phonics
    Reading
    Reading Skills
    Teachers As Critical Consumers
    Teacher Voice
    Values
    Whole Language