LIGHTHOUSE LITERACY
Contact via email:
  • Home
  • The Lighthouse Library
    • Writing Resources >
      • Ideas
      • Organisation
      • Voice
      • Word Choice
      • Sentence Fluency
      • Conventions
      • Other Writing Routines
      • Writing Analysis
    • Reading Resources >
      • Reading Routines
      • Reading Skills and Strategies
    • Inquiry Song Book
    • Spelling Resources >
      • Spelling Strategies
  • The Beacon
  • Testimonials
  • Contact

Anchor Charts

23/7/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Things are essential, words only accidental; things are the body, words but the garment; things are the kernel, words the shell and husk. Both should be presented to the intellect at the same time, but particularly the things, since they are as much objects of understanding as is language.
What if I told you it was composed by Comenius in 1658? Astounding, right?

What Are Anchor Charts?
Anchor charts are also known as posters, charts, chart displays - you get the picture. The charts I'm talking about are those that are jointly created - by you and the students - and act as a second teacher in the classroom. They support the literacy strategies you teach by providing a visual reminder of what's been learned, and what's important.

What’s the Theory Behind Them?
You should Google Dual-Coding Theory. Dual-coding theory (Paivio, 1986) tells us that we can use our visual and auditory channels simultaneously to absorb more information than is normally considered possible, and avoid the dreaded cognitive load.

Humans receive information from the environment through visual and verbal info – they’re not the only ones, but they’re certainly key. Following a teacher’s verbal explanation is bit difficult. A teacher’s schema is in his/her head and we have to guess what that schema might be, and try to deduce it based on the oral language that’s being used. Words are linear, and the verbal channel is sequential, whereas visual information is synchronously organised and the eye can understand many elements at the same time. Both of these channels have limited storage capacity and are separate and independent.

But when images are linked to words, they enrich the encoding process. Together, they greatly improve the potential for retrieval. Visuals direct students’ attention and trigger prior knowledge or existing schema, which isn’t organised sequentially, but more like a diagram. Visual links found in diagrams stimulate connections between concepts that lead to more meaningful learning.

A picture paints a thousand words!  That’s how powerful visuals are!

Adding images to verbal explanation can make ideas concrete, which makes it easier to remember.  By adding graphics, we’re offering additional cues for retrieval (Clark, & Lyons, 2010, Caviglioli, 2019). 
Combining pictures, mental imagery, and verbal elaboration has proven effective in promoting understanding and learning from texts by students ranging from primary school to university studies.  

How Do I Create Them?  
You need a plan, some butchers paper, a few colourful textas, and a willingness to NOT re-create the chart at the end of the day to make it 'prettier', 'neater', or 'better'! That last one's a toughie for some of you, I know. But trust me - there are powerful connections being made by your students between what and how they see you writing, and what they're learning and remembering! (See Mayer’s research below!) 

If you’re creating your own anchor charts, please remember: 
  • Cut the amount of content to just key words.
  • Chunk the content. No long sentences. Think of section headings that stand out. This signals key ideas. Bold these headings, or put these ideas in capitals. 
  • Neatly lined up your writing. Bullet points help. Create order!
  • Restrain artistic urges. Use fonts and colours with restraint. (Caviglioli, 2019) 

Also, Mayer’s research (1991; 2001) has these suggestions:
  • Use words and pictures
  • Record pictures and corresponding words or explanations close together in space or time. That is, create your anchor chart while you present your mini-lesson, and not before!
  • Minimise irrelevant details
  • Reduce modality-specific interference by writing simply, rather than present on-screen animations. 

Why Else Are They So Darn Good?  
They Are a Reminder of Class Learning 
They're a semi-permanent reminder of class learning. Anchor charts can be on display for the week, the term, or the year. 
 
They Provide Exposure to New Vocabulary 
Anchor charts provide exposure to the vocabulary you'd like students to learn to describe their thinking. They also provide exposure to the correct spelling of words. This helps students to use visual (orthographic) and connecting (analogy) strategies for  spelling. 
 
They Reduce Cognitive Load and Provide Connections to Existing Schema 
They're a key classroom resource. Throwing anchor charts away immediately after creating them--or only ever recording jointly constructed texts on a screen--is disposing of a connection to prior learning. Shutting off the projector means that young Miles has to rely on his memory of the lesson when he wants to use the strategy you've taught! 
 
So you see that modelling for young readers the process of creating images to enhance reading comprehension and vocabulary learning will pay dividends!
0 Comments

Inference

14/7/2019

0 Comments

 

​Part 3: Reading Between the Lines and Thinking Between the Ears

Picture
There are many, many published textbooks with all kinds of worksheets, lessons, and ideas for teaching inference. A lot of these activities are de-contextualised, inauthentic and teacher-proof. I was after some research. Show me the research! Unfortunately, there’s a dearth of research-based information for practitioners to tell us exactly what needs to happen in classroom instruction to assist our readers to make inferences. I did, however, find two interesting texts, one a literature review commissioned by the Department for Children, Schools and Families in the UK (Kispal, 2008), and a synthesis of intervention research (Hall, 2015). 

Kispal outlined her summary of ideas for classroom instruction that were supported by research: 
  • Word-level work - vocabulary building, using cohesive devices
  • Text level work - make explicit the structure of stories, the role of titles, and the multiple interpretations allowed by fiction
  • Questioning
  • Activating prior knowledge - generating, clarifying, reformulating knowledge
  • Prediction and contextualisation
  • Aural work - listening to stories, and participating in discussion in subject areas beyond the literacy block. 

Hall (2015) also reviewed a number of research articles and made this summary of implications for practice with regard to struggling readers: 
  • Help readers to identify key words in a text and then use those key words to provide answers to post-reading inferential questions
  • Teachers should consider devoting time before reading to building and activating students’ knowledge related to topics covered in a text. 
  • Provide instruction and practice in integrating prior knowledge with information in the text
  • Lay off the literal comprehension questions. Ask lots of inferential comprehension questions after reading! 

Here, though, is something interesting to consider: We understand that there’s no agreed taxonomy for inferential comprehension. So you won’t be surprised to know that we can add ‘gap-filling’ inferences to that list. There are necessary gap-filling inferences that we need to make in order to have a basic understanding of the text. For these, we use our prior-knowledge to... well... fill in the gaps to understand that the cigarette caused the fire, or the flood was caused by a kitchen appliance. Aaannnndd... there are gap-filling inferences that we actually don’t need at all. This second-type include inferring a character’s motivations, goals, emotions or personality, or making conclusions about the theme of a text, and they simply aren’t necessary for comprehension. But, these types of inferences can provide a richer reading experience, greater detail for the mental or situation model of the text, and more prior knowledge to be used at the next reading event! 

And here’s a thought: It would be interesting to note how many of our diagnostic comprehension tests are assessing this second type of gap-filling inference unnecessarily. 
​

On then, to something practical. Here are some ideas for inference instruction. You could use each of these as the focus for explicit instruction for individuals, groups or the whole class, or you could consider them before, during or after your Read Aloud. 
  • Activate prior knowledge
  • Generate predictions
  • Use think aloud to model your own use of inference, and to make explicit the cognitive processes that will help you draw an inference
  • Draw attention to new vocabulary, using decoding skills, and meaning strategies (eg prefixes, suffixes, root words, etymology)
  • Draw attention to pronouns and connectives to show how cohesive devices work. 
  • Discuss the role of the title and how it's used
  • Discuss how fiction texts allow for multiple interpretations
  • Draw attention to possible symbolic representations (colour, objects, actions, metaphor, allegory)
  • Ask questions about relationships between characters, goals and motivations
  • Help students to become aware of an author’s deliberate use of gaps (especially at the start of the novel), and why information has been deliberately omitted
  • Use context and clues to determine the meaning of an unknown word
  • Explore story structure
  • Explore metaphor, allegory, and other symbolic representations
  • Investigate picture books as excellent sources of inference
  • Infer a character’s motivation and feelings
  • Demonstrate how to use information from the text to justify answers
  • Consider how the character has changed from the beginning of the book, to the end.  What evidence is there to support your answer? 
  • Identify how the character’s feelings have changed throughout the story. How do you know? 
  • Consider what the character says or does as clues to a character’s traits
  • Explore the difference between a plot and a theme
  • Determine some possible themes of the class novel.  What evidence do we have?
  • Demonstrate how to use parts of speech to infer vocabulary

Hall, C. S. (2016). Inference instruction for struggling readers: A synthesis of intervention research. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 1–22.  
Kispal, A. (2008). Effective teaching of inference skills for reading: Literature review (DCSF Research Report 031). London: DCSF

0 Comments

    Author

    Hi! I used to run Lighthouse Literacy. Now, I've moved on to another exciting adventure in school leadership.

    My days are filled with doing my most favourite activity in the world: teaching and learning with my colleagues and our students. 

    My teaching friends are very honest about the challenges they wrestle with. These are the issues I like to write about. 

    I live in Canberra with my husband, and my beagle. I have two amazingly creative and hilarious sons who seem to enjoy watching me do my 80s dance moves. 

    I'm also partial to eating Milo from the can.

    It takes all kinds. 


    ​E lighthouseliteracyconsulting@gmail.com

    Archives

    September 2020
    February 2020
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019

    Categories

    All
    Anchor Charts
    Change Fatigue
    Classroom Environment
    Classroom Instruction
    Direct Instruction
    Explicit Instruction
    False Dichotomies
    Flexible Seating
    Inference
    Phonics
    Reading
    Reading Skills
    Teachers As Critical Consumers
    Teacher Voice
    Values
    Whole Language